Week 2024-25

Celestia Report Cal. Week 25 - 2024 #

General Information #

The following results show measurement data that were collected in calendar week 25 in 2024 from 2024-06-17 to 2024-06-24.

  • Number of crawls 336
  • Number of visits 349,055

    Visiting a peer means dialing or connecting to it. Every time the crawler or monitoring process tries to dial or connect to a peer we consider this as visiting it. Regardless of errors that may occur.

  • Number of unique peer IDs visited 307
  • Number of unique peer IDs discovered in the DHT 307
  • Number of unique IP addresses found 410

Timestamps are in UTC if not mentioned otherwise.

Churn Analysis #

This visualizes the uptime of peers over a specific period of time. The plot may display trends in churn rate, distribution of uptime periods, or patterns in peer activity. It helps analyze the stability and reliability of the network by identifying fluctuations in peer participation and examining potential factors influencing churn.

💡 Note that for agents without an agent version, they’re suffixed with 0.

024681012141618202224020406080100
all (247)celestia-celestia/0 (245)celestia-node/v0.14 (1)celestia-node/vv0.14 (1)Uptime (hours)Online Peers (%)Churn Analysis

Geolocation #

Geographical data is sourced from the MaxMind database, which maps IP addresses to corresponding countries.

This bar plot illustrates the distribution of observed nodes across different countries.

37.9%12.8%12.2%10.2%5.4%2.8%2.8%2.1%2.1%1.4%1.4%1.4%7.4%DEFRUSmultiGBLTNLROJPCAECKRothers01020304050
CountryCountCountry Distribution of All NodesTotal: 140Data: week ending 24 Jun 2024. Source: Nebula

This plot displays the weekly geographical distribution of nodes, categorized by country.

2024-06-182024-06-192024-06-202024-06-212024-06-222024-06-232024-06-24010203040506070
CountryDEFRUSmultiGBLTothersDateCountCountry Distribution of All NodesTotal Mean: 140Data: week ending 24 Jun 2024. Source: Nebula

Cloud Providers #

Cloud providers data is sourced from Udger, which maps IP addresses to known hosting providers.

Cloud Hosting Rate #

This line chart displays the count of nodes within the Celestia network that are hosted on known commercial cloud providers, compared to those that are not. It tracks the distribution over a specified period, offering insights into the infrastructure preferences for node hosting.

Regular analysis of this chart can reveal trends in the adoption of cloud services for nodes. Such information is crucial for understanding the network’s resilience and the potential reliance on cloud infrastructure.

2024-06-182024-06-192024-06-202024-06-212024-06-222024-06-232024-06-24020406080100
ProviderDatacenterNon-DatacenterDateCountCloud Rate of All NodesTotal Mean: 140Data: week ending 24 Jun 2024. Source: Nebula

This bar chart presents the weekly distribution of Celestia nodes among various cloud providers, including nodes not hosted within data centers (grouped under Non-Datacenter).

66.2%7.9%3.7%3.5%3.2%2.3%1.4%1.4%1.3%1.1%0.7%0.7%6.5%Non-DatacenterHetzner OnlineIP Exchange GmbHAmazon AWSOVHwebhoster.deHost Department LLCInterserver, Inc.Contabo GmbHWorldStreamH4Y Technologies LLCCloudLixothers0102030405060708090
Cloud ProviderCountCloud Distribution of All NodesTotal: 141Data: week ending 24 Jun 2024. Source: Nebula

The line chart illustrates the trends in the distribution of all Celestia nodes across cloud providers over the given time period. Note that nodes hosted outside of data centers are not included in this representation.

2024-06-182024-06-192024-06-202024-06-212024-06-222024-06-232024-06-2405101520
Cloud ProviderHetzner OnlineIP Exchange GmbHAmazon AWSOVHwebhoster.deHost Department LLCothersDateCountCloud Distribution of All NodesTotal Mean: 47Data: week ending 24 Jun 2024. Source: Nebula

Crawls #

Protocols #

This plot illustrates the evolving count of nodes supporting each of the listed protocols over time. It exclusively presents data gathered from nodes accessible through a libp2p connection via our crawler. The identification of supported protocols relies on the libp2p identify protocol, hence necessitating a libp2p connection for discovery.

2024-06-182024-06-192024-06-202024-06-212024-06-222024-06-232024-06-24020406080100120140160
/ipfs/ping/1.0.0/ipfs/id/push/1.0.0/ipfs/id/1.0.0/floodsub/1.0.0/meshsub/1.1.0/celestia/celestia/ipfs/bitswap/1.0.0/celestia/celestia/ipfs/bitswap/celestia/celestia/ipfs/bitswap/1.1.0/celestia/celestia/ipfs/bitswap/1.2.0/celestia/celestia/kad/1.0.0/celestia/fraud/v0.0.1/celestia/header-ex/v0.0.3/celestia/shrex/nd/v0.0.3/celestia/shrex/eds/v0.0.1/libp2p/autonat/1.0.0DateCountObserved ProtocolsData: week ending 24 Jun 2024. Source: Nebula

Errors #

2024-06-182024-06-192024-06-202024-06-212024-06-222024-06-232024-06-24020406080100120140
Cloud Providerconnection_refusedio_timeoutnegotiate_security_protocolnetwork_unreachableno_ip_addresspeer_id_mismatchDateCountConnection ErrorsData: week ending 24 Jun 2024. Source: Nebula
2024-06-182024-06-192024-06-202024-06-212024-06-222024-06-232024-06-2400.511.52
Cloud Providerio_timeoutprotocol_not_supportedstream_resetunknownDateCountCrawl ErrorsData: week ending 24 Jun 2024. Source: Nebula

Agents #

This plot shows the distribution of various user agents over time.

2024-06-182024-06-192024-06-202024-06-212024-06-222024-06-232024-06-24020406080100120140160
DateCountAgents distribution over timeData: week ending 24 Jun 2024. Source: Nebula

Stale Node Records #

All Peers #

This stacked plot depicts the count of node records stored within each node’s routing table and made accessible through the DHT. These node records serve as a mechanism through which nodes discover new remote nodes in the network.

Ensuring the reachability of referenced nodes shared within the network holds paramount importance. The plot delineates the occurrences of reachable and non-reachable (stale) node records. Note that nodes running behind a NAT are counted as unreachable even though they may be online.

For instance, if a node’s record is present in the routing tables of 100 other nodes and the node is reachable, the plot will reflect an increase of 100 in the online category.

2024-06-182024-06-192024-06-202024-06-212024-06-222024-06-232024-06-2402k4k6k8k10k12k14k
Record TypeReachableUnreachableDateCount of RecordsReachable vs. Unreachable Records Over TimeData: week ending 24 Jun 2024. Source: Nebula